07 Dec




















was my intention to say nothing more about that mat- likely to go the rounds of the prohibition press. merit a reply, and the medium in which it appeared, 47 good provision of beer and light wine will not pre- ter since Dr. Eliot virtually abandoned his contention. CHICAGO, ILL., FEBRUARY 7th, 1906. CHAS. W. ELIOT, Esq., will here give the correspondence in full. All I have And, now, as to the letter of President Eliot. It A writer in a California paper a short time ago quoted triumphantly Dr. Eliot's statement that "a cheap and ''Growler" did not let the matter rest with Dr. Eliot's statement. As I do not want to follow the fashion of The Rule of "ttot Too Much. 3 ' It therefore becomes necessary to state that the the anti-alcoholists, of publishing garbled extracts, I President Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. Dear Sir: vent Teutonic people from drinking distilled liquor to tion. But now the statement is quoted again and is to anybody, even to the president of a great university. In your letter of January 8th, you have this passage: "A to say about it is that a little slip is liable to happen Quandoque bonus dorniitat Homerus. was not of sufficient consequence to call for refuta- cheap and good provision of beer and light wine will not excess. On this point see the experience of Califor- nia." The article, however, was too utterly silly to

Comments
* The email will not be published on the website.
I BUILT MY SITE FOR FREE USING