07 Dec




















ment, showing that we do not apologize in a merely It is this oblique moral view of the whole liquor prob- only an endless string of ills come from it? Have they been harping for the last three years in these columns. The Rule of "Not Too Much." pose and whose aptest champion can not give it credit for an w ! ant to abolish the saloons without offering to put of the Rockford Star that the business serves no use- lem that we must correct. The social settlement ful purpose and that its aptest champion cannot give not concluded that a business ivhich serves no useful pur- been italicized. restricted but wiped out altogether? workers blame the anti-drink "fans" because they The words to which I want to call atte'urm nave anything in its place to answer the social needs of the atom of wholesomeness , should no longer be controlled or 143 negative way for the saloon as a necessary evil, but insisting upon and explaining the positive uses of our side, if we neglect to furnish the positive argu- it credit for an atom of wholesomeness. A study of We are in a position to controvert the statement Now, that is precisely the point on which I have alcoholic beverages as supplying what is and always has been a cultural need? massess. Are we not guilty of a similar omission on

Comments
* The email will not be published on the website.
I BUILT MY SITE FOR FREE USING